Rename mediasource to source

[voretournament/voretournament.git] / misc / mediasource / netradiant-src / regression_tests / q3map2 / degenerate_winding3 / README.txt

diff --git a/misc/mediasource/netradiant-src/regression_tests/q3map2/degenerate_winding3/README.txt b/misc/mediasource/netradiant-src/regression_tests/q3map2/degenerate_winding3/README.txt
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 3aa08fc..0000000
--- a/misc/mediasource/netradiant-src/regression_tests/q3map2/degenerate_winding3/README.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM:
-=======================
-
-The sample map contains a wedge brush.  The tip (the sharp edge) of the wedge
-is chopped off by the YZ plane (side 5, or the last side, of the brush).
-The height of the wedge where it is chopped is about 0.9.  This makes it
-barely smaller than DEGENERATE_EPSILON.  So the face resulting from the chop
-is probably degenerate, and that winding will be removed.  I'm now wondering
-what happens to the rest of the brush.  0.9 rounded to the nearest 1/8 unit
-is 1/8, so the top face of the brush should get a slight raise, making the
-"hole" even bigger.  The sides will have degenerate edges near the chop, so
-they will become triangles, creating open slivers in the sides.
-
-Although this behavior is a tad nasty, it is expected based on the way the
-code is written.  I want to make sure nothing really nasty happens.
-
-I consider this regression test to be broken if there is a "hole" in the brush,
-and I consider this test to be very broken if something more drastic happens.